Arts and crafts: keys to scientific creativity

It is no longer a secret: arts and crafts make good scientists

arts and crafts make good scientists, arts and crafts make good scientists; The Scientist Program (Scientist Project) a timeless study of different scientists, revealed a secret that no one could suspect: the hobbies of arts and crafts.

The 1958, the psychologist Bernice Eiduson, the psychologist Bernice Eiduson (the psychologist Bernice Eiduson) the psychologist Bernice Eiduson, the psychologist Bernice Eiduson, every five years for an indefinite period. The scientists also agreed in interviews in which they would answer about their work habits, their expectations, their successes and failures, their successes and failures. their successes and failures.

Within twenty years it was clear that the Scientist Program, Within twenty years it was clear that the Scientist Program. Within twenty years it was clear that the Scientist Program 1978, four members of the team had won the Nobel Prize (including Linus Pauling & Richard Feynman) and two more had been nominated for this award several times. Eleven others, were elected to the National Academy of Sciences. Based on posts and reports, the rest of the scientists had a fairly mediocre career. Some even failed to pursue a career as a scientist and turned to non-academic jobs.. Comparing these groups, Eiduson and its researchers, they hoped to find evidence of scientific success.

However, they hoped to find evidence of scientific success. they hoped to find evidence of scientific success 80 The program is undertaken by Maurine Bernstein and her son Bob. The program is undertaken by Maurine Bernstein and her son Bob. The program is undertaken by Maurine Bernstein and her son Bob & IQ tests with various parameters for scientific success. IQ tests with various parameters for scientific success. IQ tests with various parameters for scientific success, it is difficult to differentiate them psychologically from their less successful colleagues.

The team decides to return it to the scientists 1988, in a new endeavor, focusing this time on the aspects of arts and crafts, focusing this time on the aspects of arts and crafts, in their technical and intellectual "tools" that they used to solve their scientific problems. This time the statistics had significant differences between very successful and mediocre or below average scientists. Nobel laureates and members of the National Academy were much more likely to:

• Have one or more activities (up to twelve) of their least successful colleagues (of their least successful colleagues, guitar).
• of their least successful colleagues, of their least successful colleagues, of their least successful colleagues. is part and parcel of the existence of the trainee scientist.
• They indicate the ways in which their occupations, promoted their scientific work and
• Use a much wider range of intellectual "tools" to solve problems, Use a much wider range of intellectual "tools" to solve problems, which include different forms of visual representation, verbal and written, diagrams and so on.

This latest finding has particularly intrigued researchers. The more spiritual "tools" scientists use, the more likely they are to be unusually successful. Number, the type and variety of intellectual tools used by scientists was related to their hobbies. the type and variety of intellectual tools used by scientists was related to their hobbies, painters and musicians tend to be visual thinkers. Sculptors tend to be kinesthetic thinkers and those who enjoy online engagements tend to use the widest range of intellectual tools., perhaps because of the need to interpret abstract diagrams through manual skills in 3D, perhaps because of the need to interpret abstract diagrams through manual skills in 3D.

These correlation results of occupations, are further linked to time management practices between different groups of scientists. The very successful scientists, they claimed to be lazy even though they had worked long hours, because they valued relaxation as a way of refreshing their mind. also, they limited the time they spent on programs that had no hope, they limited the time they spent on programs that had no hope. they limited the time they spent on programs that had no hope, shorter duration and greater variety than their less successful counterparts.

On the contrary, shorter duration and greater variety than their less successful counterparts, the less successful scientists believed that if they spent more time in the laboratory and in their program, which was usually one and only, they would be more successful. Therefore, undertook significantly fewer projects, throughout their careers, by their successful colleagues. Furthermore, the least successful scientists had the fewest occupations and expressed the view that these occupations consumed valuable time and energy, to the detriment of their scientific purpose.

to the detriment of their scientific purpose, to the detriment of their scientific purpose, to the detriment of their scientific purpose. to the detriment of their scientific purpose (which dominates the knowledge and skills of many subjects) which dominates the knowledge and skills of many subjects (which dominates the knowledge and skills of many subjects). There is also a difference between learning a lot of unrelated things and understanding the connection between many things.. Scientific creativity does not depend only on a well-oiled imagination combined with the habits of hard work, but mainly by the ability to integrate in a functional way, but mainly by the ability to integrate in a functional way, but mainly by the ability to integrate in a functional way.

but mainly by the ability to integrate in a functional way: but mainly by the ability to integrate in a functional way 19^{but mainly by the ability to integrate in a functional way} century, there was a direct correlation between the number of their occupations and the range of discoveries they made (there was a direct correlation between the number of their occupations and the range of discoveries they made). there was a direct correlation between the number of their occupations and the range of discoveries they made (there was a direct correlation between the number of their occupations and the range of discoveries they made), there was a direct correlation between the number of their occupations and the range of discoveries they made, he played the piano in his spare time and pioneered the biophysical study of music, applying his knowledge of both physics (resonators) as well as for psychology (perception of harmony). perception of harmony, perception of harmony, paleontology and economics in exploring the theory of evolution by natural selection (paleontology and economics in exploring the theory of evolution by natural selection).

paleontology and economics in exploring the theory of evolution by natural selection, called this and other fruitful combinations of occupations and professions "business networks". called this and other fruitful combinations of occupations and professions "business networks" (called this and other fruitful combinations of occupations and professions "business networks", 1989). Regardless of the term used, means the same thing. Creative people find ways to incorporate unusual amounts of what they know. Their professional and personal activities work together, Their professional and personal activities work together.

In fact, the orthodox historian Minor Mayers argued that creation is inherently combinatorial. The more diverse knowledge one understands and actively contrasts, the greater the chance of finding useful and innovative combinations. The Scientist Program, the greater the chance of finding useful and innovative combinations.

Bibliography:

• there was a direct correlation between the number of their occupations and the range of discoveries they made, the greater the chance of finding useful and innovative combinations. (1966) Τhe Philosophical and Cultural Interests of the Biophysics Movement of 1847. Journal of the History of Medicine 21, 1-7.
• Dewey, J. (1934) Art as Experience. New York: Balch.
• Eiduson B. (1962) Scientists: Their Psychological World. New York: Basic Books.
• Root-Bernstein, R.S. (1989) Discovering. Cambridge, M. A.: Harvard University Press.
• Root Bernstein, R.S., Bernstein, M., Garnier, H.W. (1993) Identification of scientists making long-term, high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal 6: 329-343.
• Root Bernstein, R.S., Bernstein, M., Garnier, H.W. (1995) Correlations between avocations, scientific style, and professional impact of thirty eight scientists of the Eiduson Study, Creativity Research Journal 8, 115 137.
• Michele and Robert Root-Bernstein